Thursday, January 8, 2009

Foreword

Back in the 1700s, a group of men came together and talked. Each of these men had the same concern: money. More specifically, these men were concerned that someone was taking money away from them and their fellow man and giving them nothing in return. Furthermore, the men had recently read about a new concept called freedom, an idea that was fascinating and abstract. No doubt it was the happiest thought they had ever entertained, and which they certainly desired for their children and grandchildren. The men met in a small, crowded room and conspired against the government that they and their brothers had so recently come to resent.

There are many portrayals of this meeting in early American art. The room was exaggerated and made to look comfortable, with plenty of seating and room for so many people. The men wore suits that would have been exquisite in their age, and the light from a glowing window gently fell down to perfectly highlight their skin and silver hair.

But to those who have read into the story a little deeper, we know that the artist's depiction, while certainly romantic and heroic, could not be further from the truth. These men, now venerable and respected even in death, were cramped into a small meeting room meant for a quarter of their number. There were likely not enough chairs, and due to their oppressive government the meeting would have taken place on a cold night in Pennsylvania. The room would have been filled with the smoke of candles and the fireplace, and not all of them would have arrived on time. And, while the Declaration of Independence was signed, it would have been months before the names on that declaration were revealed to the public. Only in this manner were the men's identities kept secret, and their safety from the British government guaranteed.

And so, this group of men whom we now call the "Founding Fathers" informed the British Empire that the United States of America would no longer be controlled by tyranny, and persuaded the colonists to launch a war to defend their lives and their livelihood.

I embark on this blog as someone self-conflicted and worried that his government may be turning into that same tyrant with which the Founding Fathers were so familiar. Let it be known that I am an American that has loved the United States ever since I was born, and wholeheartedly wish to keep loving this great country. But I find that the America I grew to love is heading in a direction I could never accept. And so, as a concerned citizen of the United States of America, I will appeal to this great nation and its people once more: I wish each of us, the citizens, to stand up for what is right; to assist the men and women of Congress in ending the corruption in Washington, DC; to hold ourselves responsible for the actions we commit, without having to lean on our government to solve our own problems; and to fundamentally ask not what our government can do for us, but ask what we can do for our neighbors.Stumble Upon Toolbar

5 comments:

  1. After random bumblings about on the interwebs, I found your blog. I find your thoughts intriguing and will definitely be stopping by back here to see what goes on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Kyler! Tell your friends and spread the word.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Jason,

    This is my first comment on your blog after you asked me over at mine (DoF) to stop by.

    I like what you're trying to do here and I don't even know how much you believe what you're writing, nor am I certain how much of it I myself disbelieve, but consider the following possibilities in regards to what you wrote:

    The Cynic's Revolution

    Freedom was far from a "new" concept, though it was perhaps in vogue in the political scene in late 1700's Francophone Europe and colonial America (that is, it was "PC" in that day). As such, a group of men who surely had some real economic and financial grievances with the King of England and his Parliament, latched onto this concept and realized the potential it had to inspire other men, perhaps like themselves but not necessarily so, to commit themselves to a great sacrifice that could be to their benefit.

    They hid their identities as they signed that fated Declaration, not just to hide from the Redcoats of King George, but to hide from other Americans who were not so enamored with the idea of independence from England as they were. After all, just as it was in their financial interest to bring about a separation from the British crown, it was in the financial interest of many others that that relationship be maintained. Were their identities to become known too soon, they might have found themselves standing atop an American "loyalist" gallows long before they faced a British firing squad for public insurrection.

    We have to remember, what the conspirators were about to do was, in many ways, similar to what a crazed "anarchist" in a crowd of peaceful protestors might do to a police line... throw a rock or molotov from the safety and anonymity of the protest crowd and run as the peaceful people take the police tear gas and bullets. Inciting a war of independence against the British, many of whom were already using civilian homes as quarters, would be a further excuse for random acts of tyranny and oppression in the name of maintaining public order.

    Whether war for "liberty and equality" in 1776 in America, or "democracy" in Iraq in 2003, local authorities always seem to have a penchant for using the quelling of domestic disturbance as an excuse to make use of boot and truncheon.

    It was certainly a bold move, to declare independence for an enormous collective of individuals weren't entirely behind the decision and ready for the enormity of the consequences. How did you feel when Bush took the US to war in 2003?

    And here we are today, in 2009, and the truth is that the planting of the same tyranny the Founding Fathers supposedly turned against has long since been a foregone conclusion.

    And that's why I now draw your attention to the historical revisionism of another cynic, Albert Jay Nock, in his Our Enemy, The State, which has several interesting facts about the founding of the United States and the intent of the FF that you may not have known about before. It certainly came as a surprise to me. Here's the link Our Enemy, The State

    Washington, D.C., is corrupt by design, not by accident. I certainly applaud, however, your moral clarity in recognizing it as such and moving to try to end it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Taylor, thanks for stopping by. Your comment was actually very informative; while I might know some pretty basic facts concerning the founding fathers, I don't know all the specifics. I'm already past chapter 1 of Our Enemy, The State and I'm definitely intrigued at what the author has to say.

    Thanks a lot for pointing me toward a good piece of literature; I will probably wind up referencing it in my next blog entry. Feel free to stop by again, and let me know what you think about Modern Sense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jason,

    Will do, and please keep in mind my comment was based upon 40% speculation... it was just kind of a "If this was true, then what are the implications in your mind."

    Life is complex, and so his history. Just as there are probably well-intentioned people amongst the govt today, there were likely "conspirators" back then who honestly were searching for freedom and equality for everyone and were unaware or unconcerned with elements within the group who had less than noble goals in mind.

    I'll check out your other posts soon. Looking forward to your thoughts on Our Enemy, The State

    ReplyDelete